Hybrid Cost-Sensitive Rejection Sampling Approach for Improving Stunting Classification Performance on Imbalanced Data

Authors

  • Ardiyansyah Ardiyansyah Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
  • Windi Irmayani 2Departemen Informatika Kampus Kota Pontianak, Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
  • Lisnawanty 2Departemen Informatika Kampus Kota Pontianak, Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24036/ujsds/vol4-iss3/514

Keywords:

C4.5, Cost-Sensitive Rejection Sampling, Class Imbalance, Decision Tree, Stunting Classification

Abstract

Stunting is a serious child health problem in Indonesia, with a national prevalence of 21.6% in 2022. Developing machine learning-based classification models for stunting detection faces a major challenge due to class imbalance, where stunting cases are far fewer than non-stunting cases. This study evaluates six decision tree-based classification algorithms (J48Consolidate, CDT, C4.5, LADTree, LMT, and Hoeffding Tree) combined with five imbalance handling techniques: SMOTE, undersampling, oversampling, Cost-Sensitive Oversampling, and Cost-Sensitive Rejection Sampling (CSRS), using a dataset of 10,000 records with an imbalance ratio of 3.89:1. Results show that CSRS consistently achieved the best performance across all sampling methods. The optimal combination of C4.5 and CSRS yielded a Precision of 0.963, Recall of 0.970, F-Measure of 0.960, and Accuracy of 0.9703. CSRS outperformed other methods by working exclusively with real samples, avoiding the risk of clinically unrepresentative synthetic data.

Published

2026-09-17

How to Cite

Ardiyansyah, A., Windi Irmayani, & Lisnawanty. (2026). Hybrid Cost-Sensitive Rejection Sampling Approach for Improving Stunting Classification Performance on Imbalanced Data. UNP Journal of Statistics and Data Science, 4(3), 442–45. https://doi.org/10.24036/ujsds/vol4-iss3/514

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.